Alert fatigue is a security problem, not just an annoyance







Who stays accountable































Only within a policy you define, and never privileged or administrative access. Privileged approvals go to your IT specialist. An agent that can escalate its own permissions is a security hole, not a feature.
No. The alert triage agent filters noise and escalates what looks real. A live incident is run by a person from the moment it is declared.
Documented fixes for known failure modes that you have approved, with each action logged. Anything outside the runbook escalates. It does not improvise on production systems.
It is the right question. Filtering is tuned conservatively at the start and every suppressed alert is still logged and reviewable, so you can audit what was filtered rather than take it on trust. Thresholds tighten only as the filtering proves accurate against real incidents.
No. Agents never delete data or close an account. It prepares the offboarding steps for a person to execute.
It removes the repetitive ticket volume. Security decisions, architecture, and incidents stay with people, and those are the parts you were actually paying for.